ISO vs NSO: Decoding Stock Options in a Nutshell

In the world of equity compensation, two players often take centre stage: Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) and Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSOs). But how do these two options differ, and which aligns with your unique financial ambitions? 


What Are ISO and NSO Stock Options?

Regarding employee stock options, there are two main types: Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) and Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSOs). Both stock options grant employees the right to buy a set number of shares at a predetermined price, but they have some key differences. Let's dive into the details of each type and see how they compare.

Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) are typically offered to key employees and top executives as a long-term incentive. ISOs have certain tax advantages over NSOs, making them more appealing to employees. For example, employees do not have to pay ordinary income tax upon exercising their ISOs, provided employees meet the specific holding period requirements. 

Instead, they may be subject to capital gains tax when the shares are sold. This could lead to significant tax savings, especially for employees in higher tax brackets. It's also worth noting that Companies reserve ISOs for employees and do not offer them to non-employee directors or consultants.

On the other hand, Non-Qualified Stock Options (NSOs) are not subject to the exact holding period requirements or tax advantages as ISOs. When employees exercise their NSOs, they immediately owe ordinary income tax on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the shares. NSOs are granted to a broader range of recipients, including employees, non-employee directors, and consultants.

While both ISOs and NSOs offer opportunities for employees to benefit from their company's success, there are some significant differences to consider. The tax advantages of ISOs can be quite valuable, but their restrictions and eligibility requirements make them less flexible than NSOs. Ultimately, each employee's specific circumstances and goals will determine which type of stock option is best suited for them.

Check out our comprehensive guide for a more in-depth exploration of equity compensation, including stock options, RSUs, and ESPPs.

ISO vs. NSO: Key Differences

Stock Options Comparison
Feature ISOs (Incentive Stock Options) NSOs (Non-Qualified Stock Options)
Who Can Grant Options? Corporations only (for US federal tax purposes) Corporations, LLCs, Partnerships
Who Can Receive Options? Employees only Service providers, including employees, advisors, consultants, directors
Tax at the Time of Granting No tax No tax
Tax Upon Exercising Options Typically, no ordinary tax; subject to AMT considerations The difference between FMV and exercise price is taxed as ordinary income
Tax When Sold Sale price minus exercise price taxed as long-term capital gain Sale price minus FMV at exercise taxed as capital gain
Deduction for Granting Entity No deduction Equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the grantee at exercise
Holding Period for Long-Term Capital Gain Rate More than one year after exercise AND more than two years after grant More than one year after exercise
Exercise After Termination Must be exercised within three months or as set by the plan Determined by the plan/agreement, no later than the expiration date
Value Limitations Only $100,000 can become exercisable per employee per year No limit
Transfer Rules Only upon death Determined by the plan/agreement
>10% Stockholders' Rules Exercise price must be at least 110% of FMV; option term five years max Exercise price must be FMV; option term set by plan/agreement
Expiration Rules No more than ten years from the grant date (5 years for >10% stockholders) Determined by the plan/agreement

How Are ISO and NSO Stock Options Taxed?

First, ISOs offer special tax treatment for employees who meet specific holding period requirements. If these requirements are met, the options can enjoy favourable tax treatment, with profits taxed at the capital gains rate instead of the higher ordinary income tax rate. When 

ISOs are exercised, there's no tax due at the time of exercise. However, the spread between the exercise price and the fair market value at the time of exercise may trigger the Alternative 

Minimum Tax (AMT) for some employees. Employees need to be aware of this potential tax liability and plan accordingly.

On the other hand, NSOs come with a less favourable tax treatment compared to ISOs. When an NSO is exercised, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at the exercise time is treated as ordinary income, and the employee must pay income tax on this amount. This income tax is usually withheld at the time of exercise, meaning employees would need to cover the tax due then. When the shares are eventually sold, any gain or loss is subject to capital gains tax based on the employee's holding period and tax bracket.

It's worth noting that ISOs and NSOs also have different tax implications for employers. Employers don't receive a tax deduction for ISOs when employees exercise their options. In contrast, employers claim a tax deduction when employees exercise their NSOs, which could be an enticing reason companies prefer offering NSOs over ISOs.

The choice between ISOs and NSOs largely depends on the specific financial situations and goals of the employer and the employee. It's crucial to consider the tax consequences of each option type before jumping into any stock option plan. We recommend seeking advice from a trusted financial professional to navigate these complex waters and find the solution for your unique situation.

How Can I Decide Between ISO and NSO Stock Options?

ISOs are often seen as more attractive, offering favourable tax treatment when conditions are met. When you exercise an ISO, you won't be taxed on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value, unlike NSOs. If you hold the shares for at least two years from the grant date and one year from the exercise date, the profit you make when you sell the shares will be treated as long-term capital gains with lower tax rates than ordinary income.

However, ISOs come with some complexities. They might trigger Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) if the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value is significant. This could result in a larger tax bill, even if you still need to sell your shares.

On the other hand, NSOs are more straightforward in terms of tax implications. When you exercise NSOs, you will pay taxes on the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value as ordinary income. The taxes are due immediately upon exercise, and any additional gains you make when you sell the shares will be considered capital gains. While 

NSOs offer different favourable tax treatment than ISOs, they also do not come with the complexities of AMT.

When choosing between ISOs and NSOs, consider factors such as your tax situation, risk tolerance, and long-term financial goals. Remember that holding shares for a longer period may result in lower tax rates due to long-term capital gains treatment. Regardless of which type of stock option you choose, it's important to understand the tax implications, exercise price, and the number of shares involved to make an informed decision that aligns with your financial objectives.

While we may not be able to provide a one-size-fits-all answer, weighing these factors while consulting with a trusted technical expert can help clarify the factors that may impact your decision. We aim to provide sophisticated professionals with the knowledge and insight to make the best choice for their situation.


Frequently Asked Questions

  • Yes, it is possible to convert Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) to Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQOs). This might be done to diversify your holdings or due to restrictions regarding the time you've held the ISOs. However, remember that the tax treatment differs between the two types of options, and converting from ISOs to NQOs can have tax implications. This source provides further context about the differences between ISOs and NQOs.

  • There are several reasons why employees might prefer ISOs over NQOs. One key advantage is the potential for favourable tax treatment with ISOs. If specific holding requirements are met, any gains obtained from exercising and selling ISOs are taxed at long-term capital gains tax rates, typically lower than ordinary income tax rates that apply to NQOs. In addition, the employer does not get a tax deduction in the case of ISOs, whereas they do with NQOs. However, employees must still consider the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) that applies to ISOs but not to NQOs. More information about ISOs and NQOs can be found here.

  • The decision to exercise ISO or NQO mainly depends on your circumstances and financial goals. Both options have their pros and cons, primarily related to taxation. As mentioned earlier, exercising ISOs can provide beneficial tax treatment if holding requirements are fulfilled and gains are subject to long-term capital gains tax rates. On the other hand, NQOs do not have such holding period requirements but are subject to ordinary income tax rates upon exercise. We recommend evaluating your entire financial situation and consulting with a trusted financial advisor before deciding about exercising ISOs or NQOs.




AJ Grossan